| In the spring, a young man's fancy turns to love, or so the sayers
of sayings would have us believe. When Igor Stravinsky wrote The
Rite of Spring, he had already lived three of his allotted
nine decades, but was doubtless young enough that the elemental
passions represented in his best-known work came naturally to
him.
Not that the music is about love exactly. Subtitled Pictures
of Pagan Russia, and written in collaboration with the archeologist
Nicolay Roerich, the score was intended to accompany a ballet
representing a fertility rite among primitive tribespeople. It
is sensuous in its naturalistic way, but utterly independent of
any romance or sentimentality. Indeed, its first audience found
it brutal and cacophonous. Its premiere was greeted with boos
and catcalls so loud that the ballet director had to shout its
rhythms to the dancers from the stage wing. They could seldom
hear the orchestra.
One wonders whether that first audience was enraged exclusively
by the musical techniques, very modern indeed in 1913, or whether
the good ballet lovers of belle-époque Paris might
also have been offended and even frightened by the blunt amorality
of the natural order evoked in Stravinsky's music. It is still
danced with some regularity, but The Rite of Spring is
better known nowadays as a concert piece and better still through
recordings. The ballet scenario is undeniably erotic in its primitive
way, but not particularly instructive to the modern listener who
wants to incorporate the music into her or his sexual activities.
Briefly, it involves the gathering of tribes, exuberant games
and rituals, the adoration of the earth and that kind of thing.
It culminates in a mystical dance by the maidens of the tribe.
They work themselves into a trance and, suddenly, one of them
breaks away from the circle. She is the Chosen One who dances
in a frenzy and, with the last shattering chord of the score,
falls dead. The earth is appeased and one imagines that the people
and their soil will be fertile for another year.
Taken on those terms, this is not a work of art that speaks to
our day-to-day sex lives, at least not for anyone I know. Confronted
with the savage might of such primordial fears and lusts, people
into games of dominance and submission, latex fetishes and "safe
words" must feel a little silly. And let's face it, fertility
is usually the last thing some of us want to think of during sex.
But Stravinsky's music is not so much descriptive as evocative.
Parts of the score can appeal to the most modern sexual sensibilities,
provided that one brings sufficient imagination and a lusty sense
of adventure to bear.
It's unlikely that a composer has ever written a major work with
the idea that it would accompany a couple's lovemaking. One can
be extra certain in the case of Stravinsky's most famous score.
It requires an orchestra of about a hundred players, and was written
long before the bedroom stereo came into vogue. Still, its primaeval
passions suggest any number of possible scenarios which I'll leave
to the imagination of the listener.
I always assumed that Part II,The Exalted Sacrifice, and especially
the Danse sacrale with which it ends, would be way over
the top for lovemaking music. Then, just a few years ago, I met
a woman who told me that she and her husband had used the whole
second half of the score that way many times. I shrugged as though
to say, "Doesn't everyone?" In truth, I was impressed;
I daresay you will be too if you listen to the music. After a
considerable amount of study and contemplation, I could begin
to understand how it might work if one had the right instincts
and a profoundly trusting relationship. One would also have to
be 20 or 30 years younger than I am, but that's another story.
Personally, the only part of the score that I've ever used for
the purpose is the climax of Part I, beginning with The Ritual
of the Two Rival Tribes or even The Procession of the Wisest
Elder. Granted, the titles are not very erotic and, truth
to tell, not everyone will find the music a turn-on. One could
hear a lot of brutality in it if one were so inclined. This is
not foreplay music. There is little tenderness in it. But it would
suit lovers who are already worked up and wanting to come together
in a few moments of elemental passion. Some will listen to it
and hear its erotic potential, but not have a partner who can
also hear the potential. Well, who among us has not spent happy
hours alone, pursuing our sexual imaginings? As often as not,
that's what phantasies are all about.
The Part II Woman, as I affectionately remember her, declined
to go into any details about how the music and sex went together
in her life, but she did enthusiastically endorse the recording
by Claudio Abbado on Deutsche Grammphon. I'm inclined to agree
that it has the best combination of sensuality, colour and fire
of any I know. A little less sensual and more driven, any of Bernstein's
recordings will do nicely, with a special nod going to a recent
Sony rerelease of his version with the London Symphony. In fact,
most currently available recordings will answer well enough. Avoid
those by Boulez and Dutoit. They are excellent in their own ways,
but neither conductor interprets the score in such a way that
its erotic potential is well developed.
With the right person at the right moment, The Rite
of Spring might inspire some truly amazing sex.
One word of advice, though: Don't try it on a first
date.
This article
originally appeared in Clean Sheets. |